http://www.nytimes.com:80/2007/05/09/opinion/09wed1.html?th&emc=th
May 9, 2007
Editorial
Last
year, Congressional Democrats allowed the Bush administration to ram through
one of the worst laws in the nation’s history — the Military Commissions Act of
2006. This year, the Democrats pledged to use their new majority to begin
repairing the profound damage the law has done to the nation’s justice system
and global image.
But
there are disturbing signs their pledge may fall victim to the same tactical
political calculations and Bush administration propagandizing that allowed this
scandalous law to pass in the first place.
Rewriting
the act should start with one simple step: restoring to prisoners of the war on
terror the fundamental right to challenge their detention in a real court. So
far, promised measures to restore habeas corpus have yet to see the light of
day, and they may remain buried unless Democratic leaders make them a priority
and members of both parties vote on principle, not out of fear of attack ads.
President
Bush turned habeas corpus into a partisan issue by declaring that the prisoners
in Guantánamo Bay, even innocent ones, do not deserve a hearing. Lawmakers who
objected were painted as friends of terrorists.
But
let’s be clear. There is nothing “conservative” or “tough on terrorism” in
selectively stripping people of their rights. Suspending habeas corpus is an
extreme notion on the radical fringes of democratic philosophy. As four retired
military chief prosecutors — from the Navy, the Marines and the Army — pointed
out to Congress, holding prisoners without access to courts merely feeds Al
Qaeda’s propaganda machine, increases the risk to the American military and
sets a precedent by which other governments could justify detaining American
civilians without charges or appeal.
Consider
some of the other wild-eyed liberals calling on Congress to restore habeas
corpus: William Sessions, director of the F.B.I. under the first President
Bush; David Keene, head of the American Conservative Union; the National
Association of Evangelicals; David Neff, editor of Christianity Today, founded
by the Rev. Billy Graham; a long list of other evangelical leaders and
scholars; and nearly two dozen sitting and retired federal judges.
There
are a half-dozen bills in the House and the Senate that would restore habeas
corpus. But the Democratic leadership has not found a way to bring the issue to
a vote. The first vehicle is the Defense Department’s budget authorization
bill. But Representative Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services
Committee, chose not to include habeas corpus in his baseline version of the
measure, known as the chairman’s mark, which will be taken up by the committee
today.
We
hope habeas will be added to the bill by the committee, or that other sponsors
of measures to restore the ancient right, including Representatives John Conyers
Jr. of Michigan and Jerrold Nadler of New York, and Senators Christopher Dodd
of Connecticut and Patrick Leahy of Vermont, will find ways to bring their
bills to a vote.
The
Democratic majority has a long list of wrongs to right from six years of Mr.
Bush’s leadership. We are sympathetic to their concerns about finding a way to
revive habeas corpus that won’t die in committee or be subject to a
presidential veto of a larger bill. But lawmakers sometimes have to stand on
principle and trust the voters to understand.
This
is one of those times.